Practice · 2010–2020 · Cloud Scale

CQRS everywhere

Command/query separation as default architecture. Right for high-scale event domains; absurd for to-do lists.

Why CQRS everywhere became a costly fad

CQRS-everywhere failed because most systems do not have conflicting read/write scaling needs worth the complexity tax. Consultants sold eventual consistency where transactions were fine. The pattern stuck in finance and logistics; the cargo cult stuck in invoices.

Cost of the fad

What CQRS everywhere cost

Teams split read and write models for CRUD apps that never needed separate projections. Double the schemas, double the bugs, double the on-call surface — for a blog admin.

Patterns

2010–2016

Cloud Scale

Part of the Cloud Scale era (2010–2016).

Read the Cloud Scale era →

Compare with

Related

© 2026 Fadstack · Shane Code · Privacy

Opinionated history · not a ranking

Site updates

Occasional Fadstack notes. Confirm by email — this list stays off the book and advisory lists.

I use the address for Fadstack updates only. Privacy.